A River Runs Through It Essays - A River Runs Through It, Films

A River Runs Through It A River Runs Though It The movie, A River Runs Through It, directed by Robert Redford, and starring Craig Sheffer as Norman and Brad Pitt as Paul the younger brother, is about two brothers that have a close relationship. As their growing up they both rebel against their stern minister father, each in their own way. This movie takes place in the entrancing mountains of Montana, with a magnificent river that runs through it. The bond between the boys starts to fall apart as they face their future both taking two very different roads. The director effectively uses shots, action and mise en scene to show the directions both boys have chosen to take. In the middle of the clip where the boys are carrying the boat to the river, shots are used to show which direction the brothers have chose to take. The close up shot of Paul smiling shows a very eager person. Paul is in the front of the boat showing the viewer that he is leading the way. Norman on the other hand, is becoming aggravated by Paul's anticipation for trying this brainless stunt. The close up of Norman portrays to the viewer that he is not sharing the same feeling as Paul and is wondering how he is going to get out of shooting the chutes. Later in the scene, there is a close up shot of Paul standing in front of the river and all the viewer can see behind Paul is the water. This symbolizes to the viewer that Paul has become one with the water. The viewer at this point knows that Paul is actually going to go through with this reckless idea. After, the McLain brothers go over the chutes and are safely on shore, the director shoots a close up shot of Norman siting on a hill a way from the water. In this close up of Norman the viewer can not see his face it is absent of light showing the viewer that Norman is very different than Paul. All the viewer can see behind this shot of Norman is the sky, symbolizing that Norman wants to go out in to the world and not to recklessly throw his life away. As with shots, action is directed in this clip to show the viewer the uniquely different directions in life the brothers choose. Norman's actions seem to be enjoying the boat ride, when Paul and Norman are in the boat and the water is calm. Norman's actions here show the viewer that he likes life at a calm and soothing flow. As the water becomes rougher Norman starts to pull back on his oar trying to slow the boat down. The viewer can see that he is trying to keep the boat from getting closer to the falls. Paul is laughing and paddling faster. His actions show that he is not concerned whether he lives or dies. The action of the dangerous waters roaring over the cliff resembles the life Paul has chose to live. Norman is found at the top of the hill after going over the cliff, his action show the viewer that he has distanced himself away from Paul and has chosen to go out into the world and live a safe life. Not only were shots and action used to show the different paths in life the boy's chose to take; mise en scene also played an important part in accomplishing this task. The mise en scene shows the brother's futures unfolding to the viewer in the first scene. The Mclain brothers are close, the viewer can tell because the brothers share the same friends and enjoy being together. The viewer can tell that Norman and Paul are both starting to rebel against their father, because they are both out drinking, going against their parents rules. In this first scene the brothers are out drinking with their friends. All the boys including Norman are sitting on the car. This shows the viewer that Norman likes to be part of the group. Paul is sitting on the ground with his back toward the viewer. The viewer does not even acknowledge Paul. The mise en scene portrays Paul

Free Essays on Looking At Women

â€Å"Looking at Women† was written by an American author and teacher. Scott Russell Sanders this essay to show how generally men how men look at women and Sanders does not agree with how men perceive women as objects. He targets men specifically as his audience; however, women are also his audience. Sanders believes men decide how women are seen today in society. He uses many different modes and perspectives to emphasize his point. He uses classification, definition, and cause and effect appeals to show that men are the guiding factor of how women are seen. Classification is one of the most powerful modes he uses. This mode is very powerful because he does not only use his feeling and ideas as support, but he also uses other perspectives to enforce his thesis. He classifies different types of men. Each type plays a roll in how they contribute to the ways women are seen. Each class has different backgrounds and different outlooks on women. The four different classes he uses is construction men, adolescence, and writers and artist. Sanders speaks about construction men who spend most of their time outside in the sun working heir big heavy tools and having manly conversations. When a women walks by she walks by the atmosphere changes and the focus of the men are now directed to her. They are no longer interested in their present duties. Their focus is directed to the women. Instead showing respect and confront the women like a gentlemen, they chose to belittle her by whistling at her and yelling obscene clichà ©s to expose her body parts to other men in the construction yard. This characteristic causes the men to see women as objects. In addition to men adolescence are also known to perceive women as objects. Sanders speaks of his adolescent years of college. His roommate was an subscriber to PLAYBOY magazine. With each magazine his roommate would pin up the playmate of the month. Sanders ponders the fact that he would stare at the women... Free Essays on Looking At Women Free Essays on Looking At Women â€Å"Looking at Women† was written by an American author and teacher. Scott Russell Sanders this essay to show how generally men how men look at women and Sanders does not agree with how men perceive women as objects. He targets men specifically as his audience; however, women are also his audience. Sanders believes men decide how women are seen today in society. He uses many different modes and perspectives to emphasize his point. He uses classification, definition, and cause and effect appeals to show that men are the guiding factor of how women are seen. Classification is one of the most powerful modes he uses. This mode is very powerful because he does not only use his feeling and ideas as support, but he also uses other perspectives to enforce his thesis. He classifies different types of men. Each type plays a roll in how they contribute to the ways women are seen. Each class has different backgrounds and different outlooks on women. The four different classes he uses is construction men, adolescence, and writers and artist. Sanders speaks about construction men who spend most of their time outside in the sun working heir big heavy tools and having manly conversations. When a women walks by she walks by the atmosphere changes and the focus of the men are now directed to her. They are no longer interested in their present duties. Their focus is directed to the women. Instead showing respect and confront the women like a gentlemen, they chose to belittle her by whistling at her and yelling obscene clichà ©s to expose her body parts to other men in the construction yard. This characteristic causes the men to see women as objects. In addition to men adolescence are also known to perceive women as objects. Sanders speaks of his adolescent years of college. His roommate was an subscriber to PLAYBOY magazine. With each magazine his roommate would pin up the playmate of the month. Sanders ponders the fact that he would stare at the women... Free Essays on Looking At Women The Difference I can still remember those excruciatingly hot summer days when not being sixteen years old was just horrible, since my friends and I did not have the privilege of being that wonderful age in owning a car. To get to our desired destination, we would have to walk quite a lot, sometimes for hours. I recollect being so tired and hot from the summer sun that my friends and I would stagger into a place when we would finally get there. During those years we prayed every day for that wonderful age to arrive. I enjoyed those experiences with my friends. But there was one aspect I did not enjoy, (my friends would disagree with me) the constant honks, hollers, and inappropriate comments men of all ages made. My friends loved them and even sometimes kept count of how many we received. I found them disgusting and degrading to women. I did not understand how my friends could find it to be a compliment, when I found myself to be disgusted. Why do men react to women in such a way? Why are women pe rceived as objects? Will the boundary line ever disappear? Can men and women ever come to understand each other with respect? In the article â€Å"Looking at Women,† Sanders spends half his lifetime searching for an answer to his question: â€Å"How should men look at women?† (255). To answer his question he begins by going back in time to the age of eleven. He remembers staring at a girl who was dressed in a pair of pink shorts, wondering how she caused that weird feeling in his stomach. He saw her as someone who was trying to draw attention to herself. He then jumps to the time when he was attending college, staring at the nude pictures of women on his roommate’s wall. He remembers other guys gathering at that wall to discuss women as though they were parts of the â€Å"meat market† (Sanders 256). During his years in college Sanders remembers seeing girls dressed in revealing clothes and having their faces covered with makeup. He saw thei...